Its network performance suffers once you apply the additional demands of compute-intensive cryptographic calculations, though. It is partly responsible for the data transfer rates of 100 MB/s and more (in gigabit Ethernet networks). The dual-core Atom processor is also tasked with handling XOR operations for the NAS devices’ RAID arrays. In all three of our test cases, that's a meager Intel Atom D510, which of course lacks the AES-NI support that'd be needed to accelerate encryption in hardware. As a result, if you actually plan to use encryption, that functionality must be handled by the NAS device's host processor. Unfortunately, none of the tested devices from Synology, Thecus, or Qnap have a dedicated hardware cryptography unit for encrypting/decrypting data, revealing a huge potential drawback of data encryption directly on the network storage device. However, the WD 4TB version should be more than enough storage for many of you out there, so if you want an all-in-one package, go for that. last updated posted 2011-Jun-21, 2:08 am AEST posted 2011-Jun-21, 2:08 am AEST User 203023 37 posts. Inevitable Performance Degradation Through Intel’s Atom? However, if you’re a home NAS user, we suggest you go for the diskless Synology option as this offers the most customizability for your needs, allowing you to slot in the specific storage from the get-go.

Best nas for home use 2011